McLarty v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1162 [at at 3556], 2014 TCC 30 -- summary under Illegality

By services, 28 November, 2015

On December 31, 1993, the taxpayer and 21 other signatories to a joint venture acquired rights to exploit seismic data. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, no nominees were permitted, but in fact various of the purchasers were acquiring their rights on behalf of others (totaling 30) who also claimed Canadian exploration expense deductions for "their" share of the seismic expenditures. Favreau J stated (at para. 80) that this:

is not an indication of a sham. It is rather an indication that some persons were not legally members of the Joint Venture and were not entitled to the deductions. The Minister should have simply denied those person the tax deductions... .

Topics and taglines
Tagline
participations contrary to agreement were disregarded
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332817
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"McLarty\"></a>McLarty v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2014 DTC 1162 [at 3556], 2014 TCC 30 <strong>[participations contrary to agreement were disregarded]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}