Bowens v. The Queen, 94 DTC 1863 (TCC), aff'd 96 DTC 6128 (FCA) -- summary under Paragraph 251(1)(c)

By dwpv, 28 November, 2015

When a corporation ("Trilogy") made an offer to acquire all the shares of a corporation ("DEB"), including any outstanding stock options, the taxpayer, who was the chief financial officer of DEB incorporated a numbered company, transferred his options to it, sold the shares of the numbered company to Trilogy for shares of Trilogy, and filed a joint election with Trilogy under s. 85. In finding that the taxpayer did not deal at arm's length with Trilogy, so that s. 7(1)(b) could not apply to a transfer of his option rights to Trilogy, Bowman TCJ. noted that the taxpayer was a partner in a partnership which, with other corporations, raised capital and promoted the acquisition by Trilogy of the shares of DEB and that the taxpayer for some time had been an executive vice-president of Trilogy and was instrumental in formulating the exchange offer made by Trilogy for the shares and options.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
taxpayer was instrumental in causing the formulation of the terms that were offered to him
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337537
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Bowens v. The Queen</em></strong>, 94 DTC 1863 (TCC), affirmed 96 DTC 6128 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}