A parking garage which was being constructed as part of the same project as a hotel located across the street and which was connected to it by an aerial bridge, was a separate building for purposes of s. 18(3.5) and was not on an immediately contiguous site for purposes of s. 18(3.6) given that it was separated from the hotel by the street. Accordingly, the parking garage did not qualify for grandfathering relief on the basis of the work done on the hotel. Furthermore, work on the parking garage did not proceed without undue delay.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
335825
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Barat v. M.N.R.</em></strong>, 91 DTC 1097 (TCC)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Barat v. M.N.R.</em></strong>, 91 DTC 1097 (TCC)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}