Winsor v. The Queen, 2008 DTC 2116, 2007 TCC 692 -- summary under Property

By services, 28 November, 2015

Before going on to find that fishing licences of the taxpayer were capital property, so that an amount received by the taxpayer from the federal government for their cancellation by the federal government gave rise to a capital gain, Webb J. stated (at para. 26):

"Since any person who has a licence under the Fishery (General) Regulations has a right 'to apply for and resist an arbitrary denial of, renewal or re-issuance of his licence', this right would ... be property for purposes of the Act."

Topics and taglines
Tagline
fishing licence was property based on administrative law rights
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337335
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Winsor v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2008 DTC 2116, 2007 TCC 692",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}