Bowden v. Canada, [2011] GSTC 109, 2011 FCA 218 -- summary under Commercial Activity

By services, 28 November, 2015

The appellant had claimed input tax credits (ITCs) in respect of alleged businesses conducted from his home for which he had only minimal revenues ($300 in sales over a three year period.) Before allowing a portion of the appellant's ITC claims on procedural grounds, Sharlow JA rejected the appellant's submission that a business which has no personal or hobby element is not required (on the authority of Stewart) to have a reasonable expectation of profit (REOP) in order to qualify as a commercial activity, after noting (at para. 8) that the definition of commercial activity specifically requires that an individual have a REOP.

d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332014
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Bowden v. R.</em></strong>, [2011] GSTC 109, 2011 FCA 218",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}