The portion of the Minister's Reply to the Notice of Appeal that stated that in reassessing the Minister had assumed that seismic data acquired by the taxpayer was used for exploration purposes, was struck, as such assumptions was only made by the Minister when the notice of confirmation was issued rather than at the earlier time of reassessment.
Topics and taglines
Topic
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332885
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Anchor Pointe Energy Ltd.</em></strong>, 2003 DTC 5512, 2003 FCA 294",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Anchor Pointe Energy Ltd.</em></strong>, 2003 DTC 5512, 2003 FCA 294",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}