In rejecting a submission that s. 78(1) should be interpreted as applying to deny an expense (in this case, alleged interest expense) to a taxpayer only where the taxpayer computes its income on an accrual basis and the creditor to whom the expense is owed is subject to tax on a cash basis rather than an accrual basis, Rip TCJ. found that the wording of s. 78(1) was unambiguous and, therefore, there was no basis for limiting its application in the suggested manner.
Note
applied in 2002-0153837 F
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338749
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Redclay Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 96 DTC 1207 (TCC)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Redclay Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 96 DTC 1207 (TCC)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state