MacKay v. Canada, 2015 FCA 94, aff'g 2014 DTC 1059 [at 2959], 2014 TCC 33

By services, 28 November, 2015
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
2015 FCA 94
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
351565
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [
"url::decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/109124/index"
],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "cedce2d1bd25042f7e93fb220e3ed77345745f15da4012642f3bcd4612710a1b",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": {
"url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/109124/index.do",
"title": "",
"attributes": [],
"original_title": "",
"original_url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/109124/index.do"
}
}
Style of cause
MacKay v. Canada
Main text

Date: 20150415


Docket: A-133-14

Citation: 2015 FCA 94

CORAM:

RYER J.A.

NEAR J.A.

RENNIE J.A.

BETWEEN:

DR. DONALD G. MACKAY, DDS

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on April 15, 2015.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on April 15, 2015.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

RYER J.A.


Date: 20150415


Docket: A-133-14

Citation: 2015 FCA 94

CORAM:

RYER J.A.

NEAR J.A.

RENNIE J.A.

BETWEEN:

DR. DONALD G. MACKAY, DDS

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on April 15, 2015)

RYER J.A.

[1] This is an appeal from a decision of Justice Woods of the Tax Court of Canada (2014 TCC 33) dismissing an appeal by Dr. Donald G. MacKay from an assessment made under the Income Tax Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.)) in respect of his 2006 taxation year.

[2] This appeal is unusual in that the appellant does not argue that the amounts of tax, interest and penalties assessed against him for 2006 are incorrect. Rather, he argues that the amounts assessed as a result of the application of the formula in section 34.1 of the Income Tax Act are unfair and unjustified. In essence he argues that the formula in that provision of the Act ought to be changed. Unfortunately this Court has no power to amend legislation.

[3] In Chaya v. the Queen, 2004 FCA 327, at paragraph 4, Justice Rothstein, when he was a member of this Court, stated:

[4]The Court must take the statute as it finds it. It is not open to the Court to make exceptions to statutory provisions on the grounds of fairness or equity. If the applicant considers the law unfair, his remedy is with Parliament, not with the Court.

[4] Since we have not been shown that the Tax Court Judge made any error that warrants our intervention this appeal will be dismissed, without costs.

"C. Michael Ryer"

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


Docket:

A-133-14

(APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH M. WOODS DATED JANUARY 30, 2014 IN THE TAX COURT OF CANADA, DOCKET NO. 2012-2361(IT)G)

DOCKET:

A-133-14

STYLE OF CAUSE:

DR. DONALD G. MACKAY, DDS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:

April 15, 2015

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

RYER J.A.

NEAR J.A.

RENNIE J.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

RYER J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Dr. Donald G. Mackay

For The Appellant

(SELF-REPRESENTED)

Christopher Kitchen

Charles Camirand

For The Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

William F. Pentney

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent

Docket
A-133-14
Case history
aff'g 2014 DTC 1059 [at 2959], 2014 TCC 33