Lloyd v. The Queen, 2002 DTC 1493 (TCC) -- summary under Tax Avoidance

By services, 28 November, 2015

Although the taxpayer signed an agreement with a holding company for the sale of shares in a company ("READ") to the holding company, Bowman T.C.J. found that the transaction was not completed, so that there was no disposition for purposes of s. 84.1. Among other things, none of the stipulated consideration was ever paid by the holding company and the directors of READ did not approve the transfer as required by the articles.

Bowman A.C.J. stated (at p. 1496):

"If the Minister can attack a transaction in this court or the Federal Court of Appeal on the basis it is legally ineffective or incomplete, so too can the taxpayer. There is no need to wait for a provincial court to set an incomplete or legally and valid transaction aside."

Topics and taglines
Tagline
taxapyer can argue legally ineffective transactions
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333212
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Lloyd v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2002 DTC 1493, Docket: 2000-1146-IT-G (TCC) <strong>[taxapyer can argue legally ineffective transactions]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}