British Columbia Electric Railway Company Limited v. The Minister of National Revenue, 58 DTC 1022, [1958] CTC 21, [1958] S.C.R. 133, [1958] CTC 20 -- summary under Contract or Option Cancellation

By services, 28 November, 2015

Payments totalling $220,000 which the taxpayer made to various municipalities in order to obtain their acquiescence to its application to effectively terminate its obligation to provide passenger railway service in the area and instead provide bus service, were non-deductible capital expenditures. Locke J. stated (at p.1026):

"The franchises held by the appellant ... were capital assets. The payments in question were made to obtain relief from the obligation to maintain passenger service, an obligation which was resulting in heavy annual losses to the company, and the relief obtained ... substantially increased the value of the franchises to the appellant."

Topics and taglines
Tagline
payments to secure cancellation of obligation to provide passenger rail service were capital expenditures that increased value of taxpayer's franchises
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
335467
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>B.C. Electric Railway Co. Ltd. v. MNR</em></strong>, 58 DTC 1022, [1958] CTC 21, [1958] S.C.R. 133",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}