The Queen v. Burnco Industries Ltd., 84 DTC 6348, [1984] CTC 337 (FCA)

By services, 28 November, 2015
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
84 DTC 6348
Citation name
[1984] CTC 337
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
351535
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "FCA",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "Her Majesty the Queen, Appellant, and Respondents.",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
Style of cause
The Queen v. Burnco Industries Ltd.
Main text

Pratte, J [ORALLY]:—We are all of opinion that the appeal must succeed.

In our opinion, an expense, within the meaning of paragraph 18(l)(a) of the Income Tax Act, is an obligation to pay a sum of money. An expense cannot be said to be incurred by a taxpayer who is under no obligation to pay money to anyone. Contrary to what was decided by the Trial Division, an obligation to do something which may in the future entail the necessity of paying money is not an expense.

The appeal will therefore be allowed, the judgment of the Trial Division will be set aside and the Minister’s assessment of the respondent’s income tax for his 1974 taxation year will be restored. As agreed between the parties, the appellant will be entitled to Her costs in the Trial Division but there will be no order as to the costs of the appeal.

Docket
s
A-851-
81
A-850-81
A-849-81