Jack v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1041 [at at 205], 2013 TCC 1 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subsection 163(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

Rip CJ supported the Minister's assessment of penalties for her failure to report the income from her employment at the University of Alberta. She could not make out a due diligence defence for relying on Money Mart to prepare her taxes. Rip CJ stated (at para. 18):

The failure to report income of $60,000 in 2009 is quite serious... . Ms. Jack relied wholly on Money Mart to prepare the tax returns. She did not make even a cursory review of the information on the return, notwithstanding her previous difficulties [i.e. reporting $101,446.79 of income in 2008 when it was in fact $126,000]. Whether she even verified that she gave Money Mart all necessary forms, including the T4 form from the University of Alberta, could not be confirmed.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
reliance on tax preparer - not diligent - magnitude of omission
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334793
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Jack v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1041 [at 205], 2013 TCC 1 (Informal Procedure) <strong>[reliance on tax preparer - not diligent - magnitude of omission]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}