Dysert v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1070 [at at 373], 2013 TCC 57 -- summary under Subsection 2(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayers were middle-aged "all American" certified cost estimate professionals, with no significant previous exposure to Canada, who came to Alberta under two-year contracts (later extended by two years) to work on the Syncrude project. Although they acquired and modestly furnished apartments in Alberta, they maintained their substantial homes in the U.S. where their families stayed (other than short visits to Alberta) and otherwise maintained their social ties and financial assets in the U.S. In finding that the taxpayers were not ordinarily resident in Canada, Boyle J. stated (at para. 33):

Further, they virtually only took on such ties to Canada as were reasonably needed to fulfill the CCG business contract with Syncrude in an economically reasonable and commonsensical, practical manner such as (i) rented apartments with early termination provisions (ii) locally leased cars (iii) modest furnishings most all of which were donated to neighbourhood charitable thrift shops before leaving Canada; and (iv) single local chequing account used for local living expenses.

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
335937
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Dysert\"></a>Dysert v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1070 [at 373], 2013 TCC 57",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}