Lenneville v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1196 [at at 1045], 2013 TCC 56 -- summary under Subsection 163(2)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayers ran a commercial fishing business. Because a substantial portion of that business was operated on a cash basis, a CRA auditor used a net worth assessment to determine that the taxpayers' income was under-reported. One of the three taxation years was beyond the normal assessment period, and the Minister assessed penalties under s. 163(2).

Tardif J agreed with the Minister's income adjustments (subject to small corrections) but not with the penalties or out-of-period reassessment. The net worth assessment was warranted in the circumstances, and it had been performed soundly. However, there was no evidence of dishonesty or negligence. Moreover, a disparity between the taxpayers' reported income and the amount determined under the net worth assessment did not in itself prove misrepresentation.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
net worth assessment did not prove misrepresentation
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334861
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Lenneville v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1196 [at 1045], 2013 TCC 56 <strong>[net worth assessment did not prove misrepresentation]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}