Abdollahi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1530

By services, 17 September, 2025
Is tax content
Not tax content (predicted)
Citation
Citation name
2025 FC 1530
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
1040063
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [
"url::decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/528972/index"
],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "32a7dea881d8ac8192a71a7a8ebed1e407c3c22516c6c85d7ecd4003ce97c283",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": {
"url": "https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/528972/index.do",
"title": "",
"attributes": [],
"original_title": "",
"original_url": "https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/528972/index.do"
}
}
Style of cause
Abdollahi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Main text

Date: 20250917


Docket: IMM-14479-24

Citation: 2025 FC 1530

Toronto, Ontario, September 17, 2025

PRESENT: The Honourable Justice Battista

BETWEEN:

NASRIN ABDOLLAHI

MASOUD ABDOLLAHI

Applicants

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

JUDGMENT AND REASONS

(delivered orally from the bench on September 17, 2025)

[1] In this application for judicial review, the Applicants describe errors made in the decision refusing their applications for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) grounds under section 25 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27.

[2] The Applicants first allege that the reasons for the refusal ignore the Applicants’ principal concern, which was the hardship the female Applicant would face in Iran. However, the Officer who refused the application did describe the female Applicant’s concerns about facing mistreatment as a woman and the decline of women’s rights in Iran. The Officer found that personal risk to be remote given that the Applicant only described one incident of mistreatment which occurred in 2011.

[3] The Officer also described the female Applicant’s fears of continued harassment from her in-laws, but the Officer found little evidence supporting her claims about the degree of the harassment she faced and little evidence of her efforts to mitigate the harassment through means such as family reconciliation, police intervention or other legal avenues available in Iran.

[4] Regarding the concern about the Applicant’s separation from her daughters in Canada, the Officer referred to the multiple-entry visas held by the Applicants which are valid until 2027, work permits valid until August 2026, and other immigration programs that could assist in family reunification. The record also revealed that the male Applicant returned to Iran from Canada in 2023.

[5] The alleged errors raised by the Applicants mischaracterize the reasons which justified the refusal of the applications. The decision is reasonable and the application for judicial review is dismissed.


JUDGMENT in IMM-14479-24

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that:

  1. The application for judicial review is dismissed.

  2. There is no question for certification and no order regarding costs.

"Michael Battista"

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

IMM-14479-24

STYLE OF CAUSE:

NASRIN ABDOLLAHI, MASOUD ABDOLLAHI v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:

September 17, 2025

JUDGMENT AND REASONS:

BATTISTA J.

DATED:

september 17, 2025

APPEARANCES:

Adetayo G. Akinyemi

For The ApplicantS

Charles J. Jubenville

For The Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Adetayo G. Akinyemi

Barrister and Solicitor

North York, Ontario

For The ApplicantS

Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

For The Respondent

Docket
IMM-14479-24