CRA indicated that a property, which apparently was sold by the taxpayer because it could no longer be rented out to third parties, did not qualify as a “former business property” for purposes of the replacement property rollover in s. 44, stating that property which “is vacant but would otherwise earn rent, would not qualify.”
Topics and taglines
Tagline
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
891935
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
891936
Extra import data
{
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": ""
}
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": ""
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state