The Claimant purchased a used machine which it modified as part of its SR&ED project and which was accepted as being purchased on current account as it was transformed in the prosecution of the SR&ED. The Directorate found that the expenditure for the used machine was in respect of “the acquisition of property that has been used or acquired for use or lease, for any purpose whatever before it was acquired by the taxpayer” so that, by virtue of being a prescribed expenditure pursuant to Reg. 2902(b)(ii) and, thus, ineligible for an ITC. It indicated in this regard that the acquisition cost being a current expenditure was not inconsistent with there having been an “acquisition of property.”
Topics and taglines
Tagline
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
674413
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
674414
Extra import data
{
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": ""
}
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": ""
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state