November 8, 1989
Review Committee Resource Industries
Section
Allan B. Nelson
957-8984Subject: Limited Partner At-risk Rules
Paragraph 96(2.2)(2)(d) of the ActPurpose
We are writing to request your direction concerning the possible application of paragraph 96(2.2)(d) of the Act in a fact situation on which we have been asked to provide an advance income tax ruling.
Facts
24(1)
Issue
24(1)
Significance and Analysis
Subsection 96(2.1) of the Act provides that the losses of a partnership allocated to a limited partner in his taxation year will be deductible by the partner only to the extent of the partner's at-risk amount as at the end of the fiscal oeriod of the partnership ending in that year, Therefore, any reduction in a partner's at-risk amount pursuant to paragraph 96(2.2)(d) directly effects the deductibility of that partner's share of Partnership losses for the year.
Under paragraph 96(2.2)(d) of the Act, subject to the exceptions noted therein, a taxpayer's at-risk amount is reduced where the taxpayer is entitled, either immediately or in the future, either absolutely or contingently to receive or obtain any amount or benefit granted for the purpose of reducing the impact of any loss that he may sustain by virtue of his being a member of the partnership or by virtue of his holding or disposing of his membership interest.
The amount of the at-risk reduction would be the same as was the amount or benefit that was granted for the purposes referred to above.
24(1)
21(1)(b)
Finance's Comments
1. The June, 1986 Technical Notes issued by Finance state
inter alia that "New Subsection 96(2.2) of the Act
defines that at-risk amount of a limited partner at any
particular time. This at-risk amount is calculated as
follows:...any amount or benefit to which the partner
is entitled, where the amount or benefit is intended to
protect him from the loss of his investment."2. 21(1)(b)
Legal Opinion
23
Previous Departmental Positions Taken
We are not aware of any positions previously taken by the Department specifically on this issue. However, an opinion was given to 19(1) dated November 23, 1988 (a copy of which is attached herewith) to the effect that an indemnification given by a particular general partner to other general partners in the same partnership against any debts and obligations incurred as a result of the particular partner acting outside of his authority granted under their partnership agreement would not normally by viewed as an amount or benefit described in paragraph 96(2.2)(d) of the Act.
23
Taxpayer's Representations
24(1)
Alternatives 21(1)(b)
Recommendations
21(1)(a)
Chief Resource Industries Section Bilingual Services and Resource Industries Division Rulings Directorate
Enclosure