October 5, 1989
FROM - Resource Industries Section
G.R. White
957-8585 TO - Special Audits Division
E.H. Gauthier
DirectorAttention: Shaukat Lakhani
SUBJECT: Position Paper on the Taxation
of Placer Mining Industry We are writing in reply to your memorandum of August 18,
1989, requesting that we review the above-captioned
paper and provide you with our comments thereon.
After a preliminary review of the paper, we noted a
number of audit guidelines contained therein for which
we express no opinion on herein. Our comments which are
limited to the technical issues which you have
identified to us under the various headings in your paper
are as follows:1. PRODUCTION IN REASONABLE COMMERCIAL QUANTITIES
21(1)(b)
Therefore, only expenditures incurred BEFORE a mine has
achieved production in reasonable commercial quantities
can qualify as CEE.21(1)(b)
2. 21(1)(b)
As provided for in paragraph 66.1(6)(a) of the Act, any
expense that may reasonably be considered to be related
to a mine that has come into production in reasonable
commercial quantities cannot be considered as CEE.21(1)(b)
3. INVENTORY VALUATION
21(1)(b)
4. PREPRODUCTION REVENUE
21(1)(b)
It should be stated that the Department's positions with
respect to the issues discussed herein have not changed
from those contained in the attached letters. J.T. Gauvreau
Chief
Resource Industries Section
Bilingual Services and Resource
Industries Division
Rulings Directorate