16 June 2014 STEP Roundtable, 2014-0522961C6 - STEP CRA Roundtable - June 2014 -- summary under Paragraph 56.4(7)(d)

Does the fact that a contract of a restrictive covenant stipulates the amount of $1 as consideration mean that there is consideration, such that the elections, provided under subsection 56.4(7) are inapplicable? CRA stated:

While we understand that a nominal amount of consideration may be given by the parties in a contract relating to a restrictive covenant to ensure that the contract is legally binding, it is the CRA's view that this would still constitute an amount of proceeds received or receivable by the particular party for granting the RC. As such, the exceptions set out in subsections 56.4(6) and (7) could not apply because the respective conditions in paragraph 56.4(6)(e) and paragraph 56.4(7)(d) would not technically be met. In such cases, the amount of proceeds (or any additional amount deemed by paragraph 68(c)) received or receivable by the taxpayer for the RC would be taxable as ordinary income under subsection 56.4(2) unless one of the three exceptions in subsection 56.4(3) otherwise applies.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
311182
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
345131
Extra import data
{
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "15",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"2014-0522961C6\"></a>16 June 2014 STEP Roundtable, Q. 15, 2014-0522961C6 [nominal consideration tainting of non-compete]"
}