20 August 1990 Internal T.I. 900227 F - Cape Breton Investment

By services, 18 January, 2022
Official title
Cape Breton Investment
Language
French
CRA tags
127(9) approved project, 127(9) approved project property, ITR 4605(c), 4604
Document number
Citation name
900227
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
632767
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "1990-08-20 08:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Main text
  August 20, 1990
Audit Programs Directorate Head Office
  Business and General
  Division
P.P. Lauzon F.B. Fontaine
Tax Incentive Audits Section 957-2095
  900227
     EACC9295

SUBJECT: Cape Breton Investment Tax Credit Program 24(1)

This is in reply to your memorandum dated March 23, 1990 regarding the above-captioned subject.

Our understanding of the situation is as follows:

1.     

2.     24(1)

3.     

4.     

For the purposes of subsection 127(9) of the Income Tax Act, (the "Act") and paragraph 4605(c) of the Income Tax Regulations (the "Regulations") you have requested our opinion as to whether:

24(1)

Our comments are as follows:

24(1)

(B)     Regarding your concerns, we will attempt to answer the second question first.  The definition of the term "approved project" in subsection 127(9) of the Act requires that application of a particular project be Regional Expansion (the "Minister").  23

     However, if a particular asset to be acquired under the 1989 Plan was described in the Original Plan, it is our view that any such asset, as well as any addition thereto, would be part of the Project.  An increase in cost as a result of the addition would not be a reason, in our view, to deny inclusion as part of the assets of the Original Plan.  23 It follows that, in our opinion, any new separate assets which were not part of the Original plan could not be considered to be an "approved project property" to be used in an "approved project" for the purposes of subsection 127(9) of the Act and section 4604 of the Regulations for the following reasons:

(1)     The new separate assets would not be considered part of  the plan submitted "before July 1988".

(2)     Such assets may be considered as substantial changes to the Project.

(3)     The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary defines "project" as something projected; a plan, a scheme; a proposal. Based on this definition, only assets described in the Original Plan (an additions thereto) may be considered as meeting the definition of "approved project".

(4)     The French version of the Act uses the term "ouvrage  approuvĂ©" as the equivalent of "approved project".  The translation of "ouvrage approuvĂ©" is approved work and as such supports the view that it is only the under-takings that are included in the Original Plan which are approved.

     24(1)

(F)     You may wish to refer to our memorandum of June 19, 1989 addressed to you, file 7-3921, which, to a large extent, dealt with a similar situation.

We trust these comments will be of assistance to you.

for DirectorBusiness and General Division Rulings DirectorateLegislative and Intergovernmental Affairs Branch