23 March 1990 Ruling 90M03333 F - Deduction from Tax for Employees of International Organizations

By services, 18 January, 2022
Official title
Deduction from Tax for Employees of International Organizations
Language
French
CRA tags
126(3), 250(1)
Document number
Citation name
90M03333
Severed letter type
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
632147
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "1990-03-23 07:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Main text
  March 23, 1990
Mr. S. Claude Lemelin Provincial and International
Chief Relations Division
Policy and Research Section E.E. Campbell
International Audits Division
  File No. 90M03333

Attention:  Mr. Clayton Davies

SUBSECTION 126(3) - DEDUCTION FROM PART I TAX FOR EMPLOYEES OF DEFINED ORGANIZATIONS

In your memorandum you indicated that you had a case in which a Canadian resident was working for the 24(1) was claiming a credit under section 126(3) although no levy had been paid to the 24(1)

Your concern is that if the 24(1) a United Nations Agency or brought into relationship with the United Nations in accordance with Article 63 of the Charter of the United Nations that the individual will be entitled to a credit with no relationship to any amounts paid.

Section 126(3) provides for a credit of two groups of international organizations, the first being United Nations organizations and those brought into relationship by virtue of Article 63. The second group is other organizations. In all cases the organization must also qualify under section 3 of the Privileges and Immunities (International Organizations) Act.

The first part of section 126(3) gives a credit without reference to the levy. Prior to amendment, the section had tied everything to the levy so that there was no possibility of anything excessive occurring. The levy always exceeded any Canadian tax and the problem was usually how the excess would be or could be credited.

The change in the section was to meet the demands of 24(1) cause of the many problems 24(1) finance was not prepared to go this far, but did opt for the present, not realizing that any other problems existed.

24(1)

In the circumstances it would not seem that the taxpayer is entitled to a deduction if no levy was paid.

You indicate that the taxpayer is a resident of Canada. If the person is a deemed resident under section 250(1) then only federal tax would be involved. If the person is a continuing resident of Canada, he would be a resident of a province and provincial tax would be exigible.

C. SavageA/DirectorProvincial and International Relations Division

EEC/jb no6-435File CopySequence fileAuthor's copy Access to Info(2) Reading file