22 December 1989 Internal T.I. 74029 F - Termination of Partnership

By services, 18 January, 2022
Official title
Termination of Partnership
Language
French
CRA tags
98(3), 98(5), 97(2)
Document number
Citation name
74029
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
631361
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "1989-12-22 07:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Main text
  December 22, 1989
HALIFAX DISTRICT OFFICE Specialty Ruling
Kevin McGuigan Directorate
Chief of Audit Review G. Thornley
  (613) 957-2101
  File No. 7-4029

Subject: Subsections 98(3) and 98(5) of the Income Tax Act

This is in reply to your memorandum of June 16, 1989, and further to our telephone conversation of November 24, 1989 (Thornley/McGuigan) concerning a letter from 19(1) We regret the delay in replying to your memo.

You ask for our comments and opinions regarding the partnership issues raised in the aforementioned letter.  As we understand it, one partnership, Partnership A, has acquired all outstanding units of Partnership B.  Because there are now no outside unit holders for Partnership B, and for other reasons, it is desired to merge the two partnerships.  It was indicated that a merger, if possible should not involve elections by the partners of Partnership A as it would involve several hundred persons.

It is desired to terminate the existence of Partnership B and have all its assets and liabilities flow up to Partnership A and then apply the provisions if subsection 98(5) of the Act to the transactions.  However, some concern is expressed that the expression in subsection 98(5) to "one, but not more than one, of the persons who were, immediately before the particular time, members of the partnership" might not apply to another partnership.

Our Comments

As discussed during our telephone conversation of November 19th, 1989, Interpretation Bulletin IT-413 referred to in the 19(1)  letter, has been replaced by IT-413R dated July 7, 1989.  Paragraph 1 makes it clear that the rules in subdivision j apply to a partnership which is a member of another partnership and paragraph 4 makes it clear that one partner can execute the subsection 97(2) election providing he has the authority to act on behalf of the members of both partnerships that are involved in the transaction.

As the revisions in IT-413R appear to answer all the questions raised by 19(1) your reply to their letter should include a reference to IT-413R.

We trust this is the information required.

Yours truly,

for DirectorBusiness and General DivisionSpecialty Rulings DirectorateLegislative and IntergovernmentalAffairs Branch