4 July 1990 Internal T.I. 9009017 F - Inventory Allowance on Leased Asset

By services, 18 January, 2022
Official title
Inventory Allowance on Leased Asset
Language
French
CRA tags
n/a
Document number
Citation name
9009017
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
630066
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "1990-07-04 08:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Main text
  July 4, 1990
SCARBOROUGH DISTRICT OFFICE HEAD OFFICE
Chief of Appeals Financial Industries Division
M.R. Rose Peter Lee
  (613) 957-2745
Attention: Joanne Miller
Appeals Division 7-900901
  EACC9470

Subject: Inventory Allowance on Leased Asset

In reply to your memorandum of May 23, 1990, we are writing to further clarify certain comments in our previous memoranda of April 11 and May 1, 1990.

The term "purchase option" referred to in paragraph (b) of our previous memorandum of April 11, 1990 (#7-4711) should be read as "purchase option contained either in the lease".  The separate agreement and the lease must be entered into at the same time. In accordance with the comments in paragraph 4 of Interpretation Bulletin IT-233R, the separate agreement may either be a verbal agreement or a written agreement.  In either case, the separate agreement must be legally enforceable.  The essential criteria of an agreement are:

(a)      there must be at least two persons;

(b)      they must intend the same thing;

(c)      their intention must be communicated; and

(d)      the object of their intention must be such as will, when carried out, alter their legal position.

The communication of intention must always be reduced to the elements of a proposal made by one party and accepted by the other party.  In a situation wherein a company policy of the lessor would allow the lessee to purchase the leased asset from the lessor, the company policy, in and by itself, would not be considered an agreement unless the purchase option has been offered by the lessor and accepted by the lessee.  Thus while the separate agreement may be verbal or written, it is obviously much more difficult for a lessor to prove that the above criteria of an agreement have been met if the separate agreement is a verbal one.  If a person were to accept that such an agreement did exist, it would be necessary to consider whether the lessor had disposed of the leased asset at the time the agreement was entered into.  Please refer to the comments with respect to leasing in Interpretation Bulletin IT-233R and in the Round Table of the 1988 Canadian Tax Foundation Conference.

We hope our comments are helpful to you.

for Chief Leasing and Financing SectionFinancial Industries DivisionRulings Directorate