6 October 1995 APFF Roundtable Q. 22, 9522380 - PURCHASE OF SHARES AND GAAR

By services, 3 December, 2018
Bundle date
Roundtable question info
Question number
0022
Roundtable organization
Official title
PURCHASE OF SHARES AND GAAR
Language
English
CRA tags
245(2) 55(2)
Document number
Citation name
9522380
Severed letter type
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
515302
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "1995-10-06 08:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state
Workflow changed
Main text

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

APFF - 1995

Question 22

Purchase of shares from a co-owner - general anti-avoidance rule

Mr. A, Mr. B and Mr. X each hold a one-third interest in the issued capital stock of Opco. Mr. A and Mr. B wish to purchase the shares of Mr. X in Opco for $100,000. Mr. A and Mr. B form Newco, in which they hold equal shares. Newco purchases the shares of Mr. X in Opco for $100,000 and pays for them by issuing a promissory note for the same amount. Opco buys back the shares of Newco for $100,000. Newco uses that money to repay the $100,000 promissory note issued to Mr. X.

Does Revenue Canada intend to apply section 245 of the Act to this type of transaction?

Answer by the Department of Revenue

We assume that Mr. X and Newco are dealing at arm’s length, which means that the provisions of section 84.1 of the Act do not apply. Also, we assume that Opco has, in addition to the liquid assets that will be used to buy back the shares of Newco, assets that it uses in the operation of a business and that Mr. A and Mr. B wish to purchase Mr. X’s Opco shares in order to continue that business. The Department considers that this type of transaction does not constitute an abuse in the application of the Act read in its entirety. This transaction is related to the example given in paragraph 4 of Information Circular 88-2, Supplement 1.

Also, the provisions of subsection 55(2) of the Act will not apply to the dividend resulting from the buy-back by Opco of the shares held by Newco, because there was no capital gains reduction, the ACB of the shares being equivalent to their fair market value.