In response to a proposal that a payment be made to a separated wife of a husband by her dissenting to the amalgamation of a corporation controlled by her husband and in which he had a minority interest with another corporation wholly-owned by her husband, RC stated that "where a payment to a shareholder pursuant to his/her right of dissent arises as a result of transactions the primary purpose of which is to realize a distribution of corporate surplus that is taxed as a capital gain rather than a dividend and the capital gains are taxed at a lower rate, it is our view that it would constitute an avoidance transaction and subsection 245(2) would be applicable unless it is not considered to result in an abuse ... . Transactions contrived to avoid the application of section 84.1 would be considered to result in an abuse for the purposes of subsection 245(4) of the Act".
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
321619
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
345867
Extra import data
{
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": "6 July 1995 T.I. 5-931646 (C.T.O. \"Payment to Dissenting Shareholders on Amalgamation\")"
}
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": "6 July 1995 T.I. 5-931646 (C.T.O. \"Payment to Dissenting Shareholders on Amalgamation\")"
}