14 June 1995 Ministerial Letter 9507118 - INDIANS - INVESTMENT INCOME

By services, 3 December, 2018
Bundle date
Official title
INDIANS - INVESTMENT INCOME
Language
English
CRA tags
81
Document number
Citation name
9507118
Severed letter type
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
514837
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "1995-06-14 08:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state
Workflow changed
Main text

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

MINISTER/DM'S OFFICE 95-01854M
ADM'S OFFICE
RETURN TO 15TH FLOOR, ALBION TOWERS

June 14, 1995

XXXXXXXXXX

Dear XXXXXXXXXX:

The Honourable David Anderson, Minister of National Revenue, has asked me to reply to your letter of February 10, 1995, concerning the taxation of interest income earned by Indians from deposits in bank accounts held in a financial institution. I apologize for the delay in responding.

In your opinion, since the branch of the financial institution in question is situated on a parcel of land which has never been surrendered by XXXXXXXXXX and is currently being submitted to the Specific Claims Division of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development as a land claim, the interest income earned by Indians from accounts held with this financial institution should be exempt from taxation.

I note that you are currently submitting this parcel of land as a land claim to the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs. I presume that you are proceeding with this claim because the land in question is not a reserve as it does not meet the definition of "reserve" in subsection 2(1) of the Indian Act. I have forwarded a copy of our correspondence to Mr. Dan E. Goodleaf, Deputy Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, for his information.

The approach adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Williams case (92 DTC 6320, (1992) 1 CTC 225) now requires the examination of all factors connecting income to a reserve to determine if the income is located on the reserve. In our opinion, the fact that a savings account is located on a reserve would not in itself be sufficient to exempt the interest earned. Similarly, the fact that the purchase of a guaranteed investment certificate or the investment in a term deposit takes place on reserve would not in itself be sufficient to exempt the interest income earned. The connecting factors specific to an individual investor will have to be examined.

Of course, when all potential factors indicate a reserve location, the investment income will be subject to exemption. For instance, when a status Indian lives on reserve, earns exempt income and makes deposits of funds into a savings account on a branch of a bank located on a reserve, the interest income earned on that account will be exempt from income taxation in the hands of that Indian.

I trust that these comments will be of assistance.

							Yours sincerely,
							Pierre Gravelle, Q.C.

C.C. Mr. Dan E. Goodleaf

Deputy Minister of Indian Affairs
and Northern Development
Room 2101, North Tower
Les Terrasses de la Chaudière
10 Wellington Street
Hull, Quebec
K1A 0H4

C. Chouinard
957-2098
June 5, 1995