17 July 2008 IFA Roundtable, 2008-0272361C6 - Limitation of Benefits

By services, 28 November, 2015
Bundle date
Roundtable question info
Roundtable organization
Official title
Limitation of Benefits
Language
English
CRA tags
Art XXIX A 2(d) & (e)
Document number
Citation name
2008-0272361C6
Severed letter type
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
359400
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "2008-07-17 08:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state
Workflow changed
Main text

Principal Issues: For purposes of applying the Limitation of Benefits Provision of the Canada-US Income Tax Convention, as amended by the Fifth Protocol (the "Canada-US Treaty"), will Canada look through limited liability companies ("LLCs") and other entities that are fiscally transparent for US purposes, in applying paragraphs 2(d) and (e) of the definition of "qualifying person" of Article XXIX A?

Position: Yes

Reasons: Technical Explanation of the Canada-US Treaty

2008 IFA Conference

Question:

For purposes of applying the Limitation of Benefits Provision of the Canada-US Income Tax Convention, as amended by the Fifth Protocol (the "Canada-US Treaty"), will Canada look through limited liability companies ("LLCs") and other entities that are fiscally transparent for US purposes, in applying paragraphs 2(d) and (e) of the definition of "qualifying person" of Article XXIX A?

Response

The principles of new paragraph 6 of Article IV of the Treaty will be taken into account by the CRA when applying the ownership and base erosion provisions of Article XXIX A. Therefore, the CRA will "look through" an entity that is viewed as fiscally transparent under the domestic laws of the residence State (other than entities that are resident in the source State) when applying the ownership/base erosion test in paragraphs 2(d) and 2(e) of the definition of "qualifying person" of Article XXIX A. The CRA recommended that the TE reflect this interpretation.

For example, assume that USCo, a company incorporated in the United States, wishes to obtain treaty benefits in respect of Canadian source income it receives. USCo is owned by USLLC, an entity that is treated as fiscally transparent in the United States. USLLC is owned by a US resident individual. Since the United States (i.e the resident State vis-a vis the individual) views the USLLC as fiscally transparent, the US resident individual member of the USLLC shall be regarded as the owner of USCo for purposes of the ownership test. Accordingly, USCo would satisfy the ownership requirement of the ownership/base erosion test. Similarly, deductible payments made to USLLC will be treated as made to the US resident individual.