28 January 2008 External T.I. 2005-0144621E5 - Qualified subchapter S subsidiary

By services, 23 November, 2017
Bundle date
Official title
Qualified subchapter S subsidiary
Language
English
CRA tags
Article IV Tax Convention
Document number
Citation name
2005-0144621E5
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
485411
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "2008-01-28 07:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state
Workflow changed
Main text

Principal Issues: Whether a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSSS) is a resident of the U.S. for the purpose of paragraph 1 of Article IV of the Canada-United-States Income Tax Convention?

Position: Yes

Reasons: If it were not for the election provided for in the Internal Revenue Code, the QSSS would be taxed in the United States as a regular corporation on its worldwide income.

XXXXXXXXXX 								2005-014462
									Sylvie Labarre, CA
January 28, 2008

Dear Sir:

Re: Qualified subchapter S subsidiary

This is in reply to your letter of July 20, 2005 in which you requested our views on whether a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSSS) is resident of the United States for purpose of paragraph 1 of Article IV of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) (the "Convention"). We apologize for the delay in responding.

Our comments

Confirmation of the income tax consequences of proposed transactions involving specific taxpayers will only be provided in response to a request for an advance income tax ruling. To make such a request the advance income tax ruling must be submitted in accordance with the guidelines set out in Information Circular 70-6R5. However, if the situation relates to a completed transaction a request for the Canada Revenue Agency's views must be made to the International Tax Services Office. We can, however, provide the following general comments that do not constitute an advance income tax ruling and therefore, are not binding on the Department.

Our view that an S corporation may be a person resident in the U.S. for the purpose of paragraph 1 of Article IV of the Convention remains unchanged. We did not change the position we had regarding a QSSS. As long as our position regarding an S corporation remains unchanged, a QSSS may be considered a person resident in the U.S. for the same purpose.

We trust the above comments will be of some assistance.

Yours truly,

Alain Godin, Manager
for Director
International and Trusts Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch