2007 Ruling 2007-0262651R3 - Time extension

By services, 23 November, 2017
Bundle date
Official title
Time extension
Language
English
Document number
Citation name
2007-0262651R3
Severed letter type
Author
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
485388
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "2007-01-01 07:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state
Workflow changed
Main text

Principal Issues: Request for time extension

Position: Granted

XXXXXXXXXX 								2007-026265

XXXXXXXXXX , 2007

Dear XXXXXXXXXX

RE: Supplemental Advance Income Tax Ruling
XXXXXXXXXX - Trust Account Number XXXXXXXXXX (XXXXXXXXXX Tax Services Office, XXXXXXXXXX Centre)
XXXXXXXXXX - Business Number XXXXXXXXXX
(XXXXXXXXXX Tax Services Office, XXXXXXXXXX Tax Centre)
XXXXXXXXXX - Business Number XXXXXXXXXX
(XXXXXXXXXX Tax Services Office, XXXXXXXXXX Tax Centre)
Collectively, the "Taxpayers".

This is in reply to your email of XXXXXXXXXX in which you requested an extension of the deadline for the completion of the proposed transactions described in our advance income tax ruling numbered 2006-019256 (the "Ruling") dated XXXXXXXXXX, 2007. The terms LP, MFC Class A Shares, Paragraph and Proposed Transactions have the meaning assigned in the Ruling.

The Ruling will be modified by adding the following sentence at the end of Paragraph 17: MFC will elect to be a public corporation pursuant to paragraph (b) of the definition of "public corporation" in subsection 89(1).

We hereby confirm that the Ruling will continue to be binding on the Canada Revenue Agency provided that the proposed transactions described therein are completed by XXXXXXXXXX. We note that if any of the facts or proposed transactions are changed from those presented in the Ruling, the Ruling may not be binding on the Canada Revenue Agency unless you request a supplemental ruling prior to the implementation of the Proposed Transactions.

On June 22, 2007, legislation pertaining to specified investment flow-through entities ("SIFTs") received Royal Assent. As you are aware the Canada Revenue Agency is considering the issue of whether the subsidiary entities of, for example, an income trust, could be SIFTs, but has not yet reached a conclusion. Consequently, nothing in the Ruling or in this letter should be viewed as providing any assurance that LP is not currently a SIFT or will not become a SIFT by virtue of the proposed transactions.

Yours truly,

for Director
Reorganizations and Resources Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch