8 June 2007 Roundtable, 2007-0240461C6 - 2007 STEP Conf- Q. 17 - Interest Deductibility

By services, 23 November, 2017
Bundle date
Official title
2007 STEP Conf- Q. 17 - Interest Deductibility
Language
English
CRA tags
20(1)(c)
Document number
Citation name
2007-0240461C6
Severed letter type
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
485143
Extra import data
{
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_proprietary_citation": [],
"field_release_date_new": "2007-06-08 08:00:00",
"field_tags": []
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state
Workflow changed
Main text

Principal Issues: Two recent cases seem directly opposed. Can you give us any indication how the CRA plans to reconcile Lipson and Singleton?

Position: The CRA will be considering the impact of the Lipson decision on the position set out in paragraph 13 of IT-533.

Reasons: It appears that the outcome in Lipson cast doubt on the position set out in paragraph 13 of IT-533 to the effect that a taxpayer may restructure borrowings and ownership of assets to meet the direct use test.

2007 STEP Round Table
Q. 17 Interest Deductibility: Lipson and Singleton

Two recent cases seem directly opposed. Can you give us any indication how the CRA plans to reconcile Lipson and Singleton?

Response

Paragraph 13 of IT-533 states that it is the direct use of the borrowed funds that generally determines the whether interest will be deductible. That paragraph quotes the Singleton case, among others, as support for that conclusion. In Singleton, the application of GAAR was not considered.

In Lipson, the Federal Court of Appeal found that the Tax Court was entitled to consider the transactions as a whole and their overall purpose in the GAAR misuse and abuse analysis. The Tax Court found as a fact that the transactions formed part of a series, the purpose of which was to make mortgage interest deductible. The Federal Court of Appeal saw no reason to interfere with that decision. Lipson has been appealed to the Supreme Court though there has not been an announcement as to whether the Supreme Court will hear the appeal.

Many practitioners believe that the outcome in Lipson cast doubt on the position set out in paragraph 13 of IT-533 to the effect that a taxpayer may restructure borrowings and ownership of assets to meet the direct use test.

The CRA will be considering the impact of the Lipson decision on the position set out in paragraph 13 of IT-533 and our conclusions will be published in an upcoming Income Tax Technical News. In the interim, if you have specific proposed transactions we recommend that you request an advance income tax ruling.

June 8, 2007