SUPREME COURT OF CANADA |
|||
Citation: R. v. Stevenson* |
|
Appeal Heard and Judgment Rendered: November 8, 2024 Reasons for Judgment: to follow Docket: 41269 |
|
Between:
Thomas Stevenson Appellant
and
His Majesty The King Respondent
- and -
Independent Criminal Defence Advocacy Society Intervener
|
|||
Coram: Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal and O’Bonsawin JJ. |
|||
Judgment Read By: (para. 1) |
Rowe J. |
||
Majority: |
Martin, Kasirer, Jamal and O’Bonsawin JJ. |
||
Dissent: |
Rowe J. |
||
Counsel:
Thomas Hynes and Logan R. Marchand, for the appellant. Andrew S. Davis, for the respondent. Tony C. Paisana and Nikos Harris, K.C., for the intervener.
|
|||
Note: This document is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the Canada Supreme Court Reports.
* Neutral citation to follow.
|
|
|
No. 41269
November 8, 2024 |
|
Le 8 novembre 2024 |
|
|
|
Coram: Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal and O’Bonsawin JJ. |
|
Coram : Les juges Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal et O’Bonsawin |
|
|
|
BETWEEN:
Thomas Stevenson Appellant - and -
His Majesty The King Respondent
- and -
Independent Criminal Defence Advocacy Society
Intervener |
|
ENTRE :
Thomas Stevenson Appelant - et -
Sa Majesté le Roi Intimé
- et -
Independent Criminal Defence Advocacy Society
Intervenante |
|
|
|
JUDGMENT
The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, Number CACR3588, 2024 SKCA 40, dated April 11, 2024, was heard on November 8, 2024, and the Court on that day delivered the following judgment orally:
Rowe J. — The majority of the Court would dismiss the appeal. I would have allowed the appeal. Short reasons will follow.
|
|
JUGEMENT
L’appel interjeté contre l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de la Saskatchewan, numéro CACR3588, 2024 SKCA 40, daté du 11 avril 2024, a été entendu le 8 novembre 2024 et la Cour a prononcé oralement le même jour le jugement suivant :
[traduction] Le juge Rowe — La Cour, à la majorité, est d’avis de rejeter l’appel. J’aurais accueilli l’appel. De courts motifs suivront. |
J.S.C.C.
J.C.S.C.