Stack v. The King, 2024 TCC 137 -- summary under Solicitor-Client Privilege

By services, 22 December, 2024

In finding that an email from an individual at a financial planning firm to an accountant was protected by solicitor-client privilege, Bocock J stated (at para. 15):

While the accurate description or title of the document does not, unlike the above memoranda perhaps, explicitly disclose the integrated legal advice proffered by counsel to clients concerning a factual scenario, the document elementally contains protected confidential legal advice which is the subject of properly claimed solicitor/client privilege. This was easily identified by the Court after review, despite its delivery to an intermediately retained professional. The use of an accountant as a representative in the course of obtaining legal advice or legal assistance for a client does not nullify otherwise privileged communications: Imperial Tobacco at para 71, citing Susan Hosiery … . Such is the case with this document.

After having canvassed the law of solicitor-client privilege, he also found that two reporting memoranda of a tax law firm (Felesky Flynn) to the taxpayers or their accountant were also protected by privilege.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
legal advice transmitted by a financial planning firm to an accountant for the taxpayers was protected by privilege
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
917070
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
917071
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state