MELP Enterprises Ltd. v. The King, 2024 TCC 130 -- summary under Paragraph 142(1)(g)

By services, 10 October, 2024

MELP was found to be performing its services to Canadian patients who underwent bariatric surgery at the surgical unit in Mexico of a Mexican company (“LIMARP”) as agent for LIMARP given that their conduct implied an agency arrangement.

However, its own fees (collected by deduction from the fees collected by it from the patients before remittance to LIMARP) were not zero-rated under s. VI-V-5 given that that the services which MELP performed on behalf of LIMARP (including a wide range of various pre-operation and post-operation services) were in significant part performed in Canada. Thus, services performed by LIMARP through its agent were performed in part in Canada, so that their place of supply was deemed under s. 142(1)(g) to be in Canada, contrary to the requirements of s. VI-V-5(b) that the zero-rated agency services be in respect of supplies made outside Canada.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
services performed by Mexican hospital were partly performed in Canada by virtue of its Canadian agent, so that their place of supply under s. 142(1)(g) was in Canada
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
881402
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
881403
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state