The Chief Justice (judgment delivered from the Bench) (concurred in by Pratte, J and Hyde, DJ):—There is no material difference between this appeal and the appeal heard simultaneously in The Queen v Rockmore Investments Ltd [see p 291]. For the reasons given in connection with that appeal, I propose that this appeal be dismissed with costs and I direct that a copy of my reasons in that appeal, when transcribed, be placed on A-372-75.
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
[1976] CTC 294
Citation name
[1976] DTC 6158_1
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
790430
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "Her Majesty the Queen, Appellant, and MRT Investments Limited, Respondent.",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "Her Majesty the Queen, Appellant, and MRT Investments Limited, Respondent.",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
Style of cause
Her Majesty the Queen v. MRT Investments Limited
Main text
Court