Simonetta v. The King, 2023 TCC 54 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Paragraph (f)

By services, 16 May, 2023

Ms. Simonetta acquired a new Toronto home in Toronto pursuant to a purchase agreement that specified that the purchase price included any applicable HST. The vendors (two individuals) claimed that the sale was exempt from HST, so that it was evident that they did not consider Ms. Simonetta to have paid them any HST on the purchase, and that they would not complete the builder-required portion (“Section D”) of the form for the new housing rebate.

Sommerfeldt J found on the evidence (even though the vendors were not parties to the case) that the vendors had never occupied the home as a residence and had sold the home as an adventure in the nature of trade – so that they were builders, and the sale was subject to HST. Accordingly, Ms. Simonetta had established one of the mooted requirements for claiming the rebate, namely that she had paid HST on her purchase.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
purchaser established that the vendor was a builder
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
677508
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
677509
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state