David Luterman, Hyman Rosen, Sam Vasilevsky, Joseph Vasilevsky v. Minister of National Revenue, [1965] CTC 13, 65 DTC 5007

By services, 11 April, 2023
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
[1965] CTC 13
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Citation name
65 DTC 5007
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
675833
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "DAVID LUTERMAN, HYMAN ROSEN, SAM VASILEVSKY, JOSEPH VASILEVSKY, Appellants, and MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent.",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
Style of cause
David Luterman, Hyman Rosen, Sam Vasilevsky, Joseph Vasilevsky v. Minister of National Revenue
Main text

KEARNEY, J.:—The appeal herein was dealt with by consent on the same evidence and argument as that in the appeal of D. Rothenberg v. M.N.R., [1965] C.T.C. 1, in which I delivered written reasons for judgment on December 30, 1964.

For the same reasons set out in the above mentioned judgment mutatis mutandis the appeal herein is dismissed with costs.

Judgment accordingly.

Court
Exchequer Court of Canada