James v. R., [1997] 3 C.T.C. 22, 97 D.T.C. 5289

By services, 1 March, 2023
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
[1997] 3 C.T.C. 22
Citation name
97 D.T.C. 5289
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
673857
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
Style of cause
James v. R.
Main text

Marceau J.A.:

1 We are all of the view that this appeal cannot succeed.

2 The argument, using the Bill of Rights as an aid to interpretation, does not convince us that we should depart from the jurisprudence of this Courtas to how section 165(3) of the Income Tax Act should be constructed.

3 The appeal will be dismissed with costs.