Hulmann v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 316, 75 D.T.C. 5198, [1975] C.T.C. 303 #1, [1975] C.T.C. 303

By services, 1 March, 2023
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
[1975] C.T.C. 316
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Citation name
75 D.T.C. 5198
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Citation name
[1975] C.T.C. 303 #1
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Citation name
[1975] C.T.C. 303
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
673259
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
Style of cause
Hulmann v. Minister of National Revenue
Main text

Collier, J:

1 This appeal was heard on common evidence with the appeal of Antoine Hulmann v. The Queen (p 297). The reasons given in the latter case shall apply in this case.

2 The appeal is accordingly dismissed. The reassessments by the Minister of National Revenue for the years 1966 through 1969 are confirmed. The respondent is entitled to costs.

Court
Federal Court Trial Division