Clark v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2292 #1, 75 D.T.C. 187, [1975] C.T.C. 2292

By services, 1 March, 2023
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
[1975] C.T.C. 2292 #1
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Citation name
75 D.T.C. 187
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Citation name
[1975] C.T.C. 2292
Source
https://taxinterpretations.com/
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
673126
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
Style of cause
Clark v. Minister of National Revenue
Main text

Roland St-Onge:

1 Upon reading the consent to judgment filed with this Board to the effect that the decision in Richard Robert Easton v. MNR shall be equally binding in these appeals;

2 It is ordered and adjudged that the appeals in respect of the 1972 taxation year be and the same are hereby allowed in accordance with the terms of the consent to judgment filed.

Court
Tax Review Board