Norman L Flindall v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2237, 72 DTC 1195

By services, 21 December, 2022
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
[1972] CTC 2237
Citation name
72 DTC 1195
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
667266
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "Norman L Flindall, Appellant, and Minister of National Revenue, Respondent.",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
Style of cause
Norman L Flindall v. Minister of National Revenue
Main text

A J Frost:—This is an appeal from a reassessment dated May 20, 1971 in respect of the appellant’s 1969 taxation year. It was heard at Belleville, Ontario on December 14, 1971 by the Tax Appeal Board as it was then constituted.

The question in issue is whether or not the appellant was in the business of farming with a reasonable expectation of profit during the year 1969. The appellant testified that during that year he was carrying on a farm operation and that the main area of the farming operation was a family farm established by his grandfather in the 1800’s. He claimed that he has always carried on the business of farming with a reasonable expectation of profit.

The appellant had a full-time job as a bookkeeper. In addition he did some outside bookkeeping work and prepared income tax returns for clients. From the evidence, it was apparent that his farming activities had virtually come to a stop about 1966. No income was reported in 1969 and no expenses or outlays indicative of normal farming operations were reported. Under the circumstances the only conclusion the Board can draw is that the appellant at the relevant time was no longer in the business of farming with a reasonable expectation of profit. I also find on the basis of the facts adduced that the appellant’s earned income for the 1969 taxation year, within the meaning of paragraph 79B(1)(c) and subsection 32(5) of the Income Tax Act, was $4,331.37.

Appeal dismissed.