Darryl K Foerster, William a Wickett and Douglas E Yates v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2052, 72 DTC 1050

By services, 21 December, 2022
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
[1972] CTC 2052_1
Citation name
72 DTC 1050_1
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
667147
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "",
"field_external_guid": [],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "DARRYL K FOERSTER, WILLIAM A WICKETT and DOUGLAS E YATES, Appellants, and MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent.",
"field_import_body_hash": "",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": ""
}
Style of cause
Darryl K Foerster, William a Wickett and Douglas E Yates v. Minister of National Revenue
Main text

W O Davis:—These appellants being fellow members of the partnership association known as The R B White Clinic, of Penticton, BC, of which Dr William H White is also a participating member; and all three having appealed against assessments to income tax for the 1965 taxation year.

For the reasons for judgment issued this day in the appeal of William H White v MNR, these appeals are allowed in part, to the extent indicated in the White judgment, with respect to car operating expenses, capital cost allowance on business automobiles and certain telephone charges assessed as a benefit to the appellants, and the assessments in question are referred back to the Minister for reassessment accordingly.

Appeals allowed in part.