An interest rate under a term facility intended to qualify for the exemption under s. 212(1)(b)(vii) was equal to LIBOR plus a spread which decreased as the leverage (measured by the ratio of funded debt of the borrowers to EBITDA) decreased. CRA ruled this arrangement did not cause the post-amble to s. 212(1)(b) to apply. Although the interest payable varied as a result of changes in EBITDA, the extra amounts payable simply used EBITDA as a tool to assess creditworthiness and, as the borrower became more profitable, payments decreased, which was the opposite of participating debt.
Topics and taglines
Tagline
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
318333
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
343725
Extra import data
{
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": "1 January 2005 Ruling 2005-016152 [variable interest tracked creditworthiness]"
}
"field_editor_tags": [],
"field_roundtable_subquestion": "",
"field_stub": false,
"field_legacy_header": "1 January 2005 Ruling 2005-016152 [variable interest tracked creditworthiness]"
}